Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 4


                      Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                                                   
                      Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                                                               
                                                                                                                    Page                                 
                       c. USPTO actions are not collateral estoppel .........................     87                                                     
                      d. Context of all threads must be capable of being saved ......     91                                                             
                      e. Arguments about 1991 application not considered ............     92                                                             
                      f. Effective date for "multithreading" is not 1982 ...................     93                                                      
                      ANTICIPATION ................................................................................     93                               
                      Krantz ..............................................................................................     93                       
                      De Jong ...........................................................................................     94                         
                       Issue ............................................................................................     94                         
                      Principles of law .........................................................................     94                                 
                       Facts ............................................................................................     94                         
                      Analysis ......................................................................................     97                             
                      OBVIOUSNESS .................................................................................   100                                
                      Krantz and Nitta ..............................................................................   100                              
                        Issue ............................................................................................   100                         
                      Principles of law .........................................................................   100                                  
                        Facts ............................................................................................   101                         
                      1. Scope of prior art ................................................................   101                                       
                      2. Content of Krantz ...............................................................   101                                         
                      3. Content of Nitta ..................................................................   103                                       
                        4. Differences ..........................................................................   104                                  
                      5. Level of skill in the art ........................................................   105                                        
                      6. Objective evidence ..............................................................   106                                         
                       Analysis ......................................................................................   107                             
                      1. Objective evidence is not entitled to any weight ................   107                                                         
                      2. Spelling and grammar checking .........................................   109                                                   
                       3. Error message .....................................................................   110                                      
                      4. Cursor movement, screen scroll, and line deletion .............   112                                                           
                      5. General lexical and syntactic analysis ................................   112                                                   
                         6. Summary .............................................................................   116                                  
                      De Jong and Nitta or Heard ............................................................   116                                      


                                                                           4                                                                             

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013