Ex Parte Radtke - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2189                                                                                   
                Application 10/249,909                                                                             

                                                  INTRODUCTION                                                     
                       Claims 1 and 17 are illustrative:                                                           
                       1.  A welding-type apparatus housing comprising:                                            
                       an end panel;                                                                               
                       a bezel attached to the end panel and having a plurality of covers                          
                pivotally attached to the bezel over a plurality of terminal posts openings,                       
                each having a passage therein to allow cable passage therethrough when the                         
                covers are in a closed position.                                                                   
                       17.  A welding-type device comprising:                                                      
                       an end panel;                                                                               
                       a bezel attached to the end panel of the welding-type device; and                           
                       a plurality of covers pivotally attached to the bezel by a common                           
                hinge pin.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                  
                       The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence                       
                of unpatentability:                                                                                
                Suret    US 5,091,827  Feb. 25, 1992                                                               
                Brownlie   US 5,122,069  Jun. 16, 1992                                                             
                Latvis    US 5,734,148  Mar. 31, 1998                                                              

                       The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                                 
                    1. Claims 1-11, 13-16, 19-21, 27, and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                          
                       § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Latvis in view of Suret and                             
                       Brownlie.                                                                                   
                    2. Claims 17, 18, and 22-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as                            
                       unpatentable over Latvis in view of Suret.                                                  

                                                        2                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013