Ex Parte Yamadera et al - Page 11

                Appeal 2007-2242                                                                                 
                Application 10/352,997                                                                           
                Federal Circuit ruled, "We decline to extract from Merck[ ] 2  the rule that the                 
                Solicitor appears to suggest that regardless of how broad, a disclosure of a                     
                chemical genus renders obvious any species that happens to fall within it."                      
                In re Jones, 958 F.2d 347, 350, 21 USPQ2d 1941, 1943 (Fed. Cir. 1992).                           
                       In the present case, no fewer than 12 elements are named in                               
                Applicants' claim 1, each with a prescribed range of relative amount.  Of                        
                those 12 elements, Lee discloses only five (Fe, C, Mn, P, and S) that are                        
                entirely within the recited (in the case of iron, implied) ranges, and three                     
                more (Si, Mo, and W), that have a substantial and preferred overlap with the                     
                claimed ranges.  Lee's preferred amounts of the remaining four elements, as                      
                shown in the majority opinion, are not within the scope of Applicants'                           
                claimed subject matter.  Conversely, Lee indicates that amounts in                               
                Applicants' ranges tend to lead to properties, such as a loss in high                            
                temperature ductility, that Lee is trying to avoid.                                              
                       The evidence favoring a conclusion of obviousness are Lee's general                       
                teachings of ranges of elements in steel alloys.  The contrary evidence are                      
                Lee's specific cautions that certain ranges of four elements, Cu, Ni, Cr, and                    
                N, lead to undesired results in the general class of claimed steel alloys.                       
                Particularly because it appears that all the elements interact with one                          
                another, this does not seem to be a case of linear optimization of                               
                independent parameters.  Moreover, the Examiner has not directed our                             
                attention to any teachings suggesting that the specific combination of ranges                    
                of the required elements would have been expected to be beneficial.  In light                    
                of the complexity and unpredictability of the art of steel alloys indicated by                   
                                                                                                                
                2 Merck & Co. v. Biocraft Labs., Inc., 874 F.2d 804, 10 USPQ2d 1843 (Fed.                        
                Cir. 1989).                                                                                      
                                                       11                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013