Ex Parte Dorschner - Page 10

                Appeal 2007-2409                                                                             
                Application 10/034,846                                                                       
                creped fabrics, crimped fabrics, extensible fiber fabrics, bonded-carded                     
                fabrics, micro-pleated fabrics, or polymer films.  (Specification 18.)   Thus,               
                the stretchability of the outer cover of the claimed disposable absorbent                    
                article is attributed to a property of the material comprising the outer cover.              
                In addition, the Specification indicates that in the claimed disposable                      
                absorbent article the leg elastics are adhered to the outer cover in a stretched             
                position, and thus are not part of the outer cover material.  (Specification 9.)             
                      While Roe describes that the back sheet or outer cover can be made of                  
                a flexible material that is conforming to the shape of the body, and also                    
                describes elastic leg cuffs running the entire length of the back sheet, there is            
                no evidence before us that the actual material comprising the back sheet or                  
                outer cover is elastic or extensible.  The back sheet of Roe, on the other                   
                hand, may comprise a woven or non-woven material, or polymeric films                         
                such as thermoplastic films of polyethylene or polypropylene.  (Roe, col. 9,                 
                ll. 15-30.)  Thus there is no suggestion that the films or woven or non-woven                
                materials of Roe are extensible, as they are merely stated to be flexible.                   
                      In view of the above, we conclude that Roe does not describe a                         
                stretchable outer cover as claimed and the rejection of claims 83-89, 91-92,                 
                100-102 and 106-111 is reversed.                                                             

                                              CONCLUSION                                                     
                      In summary, we reverse the anticipation rejection of the claims over                   
                Roe and Clear.                                                                               





                                                     10                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013