Appeal 2007-2421
Application 10/289,793
673, 674 (1960) (combination of old elements that added nothing to
the nature and quality of the product was obvious).
CONCLUSION
Upon consideration of the record and for the reasons given, it
is:
Ordered that the Examiner’s rejections of claims 1-18 are
reversed.
Further Ordered that the Examiner’s rejection of claim 19 as
obvious over Nakagawa in view of Ando is affirmed.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
cc (via U.S. Mail):
FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & CHICK, PC
220 Fifth Avenue
16th Floor
New York, NY 10001-7708
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: September 9, 2013