Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Sansone - Page 3

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2007 > Ex Parte Sansone - Page 3

                Appeal 2007-2446                                                                              
                Application 09/817,998                                                                        
                Srinivasan  US 6,072,862  Jun. 6, 2000                                                        
                Gordon  US 6,289,323, B1  Sep. 11, 2001                                                       
                                                             (filed Jun. 18, 1999)                            
                Busch   US 6,390,921 B1  May 21, 2002                                                         
                                                             (filed Feb. 7, 2000)                             
                Kuebert  US 2002/0165729 A1 Nov. 7, 2002                                                      
                                                             (filed Oct. 15, 2001)                            
                Sherwood  US 6,542,584 B1  Apr. 1, 2003                                                       


                                         REJECTIONS AT ISSUE                                                  
                      Claims 1 through 11, 15 through 16, 19 through 21, and 23 through 25                    
                stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over Kuebert                   
                in view of Lynt and Srinivasan.   The Examiner’s rejection is set forth on                    
                pages 3 through 6 of the Answer.                                                              
                      Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being                             
                unpatentable over Kuebert in view of Lynt, Srinivasan, and Sherwood.  The                     
                Examiner’s rejection is set forth on page 6 of the Answer.                                    
                      Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being                             
                unpatentable over Kuebert in view of Lynt, Srinivasan, and McKeen.  The                       
                Examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 6 and 7 of the Answer.                             
                      Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being                             
                unpatentable over Kuebert in view of Lynt, Srinivasan, and Gordon.  The                       
                Examiner’s rejection is set forth on page 7 of the Answer.                                    



                                                      3                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 







Last modified: November  3, 2007