onecle

Ex Parte Haga et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                 Ex parte MATTHEW HOWARD HAGA                                                
                                       and DANNY E. SWINDLER                                                 
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-2560                                                
                                          Application 10/310,356                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                         Decided:  August 28, 2007                                           
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                              
                PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 13-16.  Claim 13 is               
                illustrative:                                                                                
                13. An apparatus for applying a cover to a gaming ticket substrate, the                      
                apparatus including:                                                                         
                      (a) a cover mechanism for advancing a cover material along a                           
                            cover material path to an applicator and for advancing a gaming                  


                                                                                                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013