The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JIN SUZUKI,
DAVID RANDAL HINTON,
JULIE A. GANNON, and
CONRAD GENE GREMBOWICZ
____________
Appeal 2007-2682
Application 10/326,4101
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: 10 July 2007
____________
Before JAMESON LEE, RICHARD TORCZON, and SALLY C.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. Statement of the Case
This is a decision on appeal by an applicant under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a)
from a rejection of claims 24, 26, and 34-38 of Application 10/326,410. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 The real party in interest is Caterpillar Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013