Ex Parte Vrolijk et al - Page 1





                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board                                     
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                             _______________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                             _______________                                                 
                                       Ex parte ENNO J. VROLIJK                                              
                                           and DERK VEGTER                                                   
                                             ______________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-3496                                                
                                          Application 10/344,472                                             
                                          Technology Center 3700                                             
                                             _______________                                                 
                                         Decided:  August 28, 2007                                           
                                             _______________                                                 
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                  
                PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary                        
                Examiner finally rejecting for at least the second time claims 1, 2, 11, 14, 18,             
                and 20 through 26 in the Office Action mailed March 21, 2006.                                
                35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).                               
                      We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013