<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law and Legal Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law.onecle.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://law.onecle.com</link>
	<description>Lawyers, Legal Websites, Legal News and Legal Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stock Photo Models Against Tom Campbell</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2010/02/04/stock-photo-models-against-tom-campbell/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2010/02/04/stock-photo-models-against-tom-campbell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carly fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom campbell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! News: Bizarre Attack Ad Heats Up California Senate Race. The campaign for high-profile California Senate candidate Carly Fiorina has released an attack ad against one of her Republican primary opponents that just might be the most bizarre in American political history, one that&#8217;s already being called everything from &#8220;terrifying&#8221; to &#8220;psychedelic.&#8221;
I saw the ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><p><strong>Yahoo! News</strong>: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100204/pl_ynews/ynews_pl1112">Bizarre Attack Ad Heats Up California Senate Race</a>. The campaign for high-profile California Senate candidate Carly Fiorina has released an attack ad against one of her Republican primary opponents that just might be the most bizarre in American political history, one that&#8217;s already being called everything from &#8220;terrifying&#8221; to &#8220;psychedelic.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I saw the ad and it is every bit as weird as described.  From bad graphics to fake citizens opposed to Tom Campbell.  Yes, FAKE.  Here&#8217;s the voiceover dialogue:</p>
<blockquote><p>Who would remember that as the governor&#8217;s chief budget officer, Campbell was the architect of disastrous 2005 budget. A budget so bloated with increased ongoing spending commitments and borrowing that it literally set the stage for the recent decline of California.  That&#8217;s fiscally conservative Tom? Who would remember that was the Tom Campbell budget?  We would.</p></blockquote>
<p>At &#8220;we would,&#8221; the video freezes momentarily on this group of &#8220;citizens.&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://law.onecle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/carly-istockphoto.jpg" alt="" title="Carly Fiorina / Tom Campbell Senate Ad" width="319" height="263" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-326" /></p>
<p>I saw the photo and it looked a bit too composed.  Much like the many photos that I&#8217;ve seen on iStockphoto.  So, with the screenshot from below, I used <a href="http://www.tineye.com">TinEye</a>, a reverse image search engine.  Just upload or specify an online photo, and TinEye will attempt to locate the same image online.</p>
<div style="margin-bottom:1em;"><object width="512" height="322"><param name="movie" value="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?ver=2.2.46" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="AllowScriptAccess" VALUE="always" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashVars" value="id=17975045&#038;vid=6911326〈=en-us&#038;lang=en-us&#038;intl=us&#038;thumbUrl=http%3A//l.yimg.com/a/p/i/bcst/videosearch/13303/101675492.jpeg&#038;embed=1" /><embed src="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?ver=2.2.46" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="322" allowFullScreen="true" AllowScriptAccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashVars="id=17975045&#038;vid=6911326〈=en-us&#038;lang=en-us&#038;intl=us&#038;thumbUrl=http%3A//l.yimg.com/a/p/i/bcst/videosearch/13303/101675492.jpeg&#038;embed=1" ></embed></object><br /><a href="http://video.yahoo.com/watch/6911326%E3%80%88=en-us/17975045">Carly for California released FCINO</a> @ <a href="http://video.yahoo.com" >Yahoo! Video</a></div>
<p>In this case, TinEye worked spectacularly well and pointed me to this page of <a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-8308186-jobs-concerned-group-of-workers.php">Concerned Group of Workers</a> on iStockphoto.</p>
<p>These concerned group of workers allegedly remember the Tom Campbell budget?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/8308186/2/istockphoto_8308186-jobs-concerned-group-of-workers.jpg"></p>
<p>I wonder if the use of the photo to depict people that remember the Tom Campbell budget and presumably support Carly Fiorina constitutes <a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/license_comparison.php">use that depicts personal endorsement by model</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2010/02/04/stock-photo-models-against-tom-campbell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Product Liability Laws and Books</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/09/product-liability-laws-and-books/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/09/product-liability-laws-and-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product recall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission issues product recalls when consumer products present an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death.  Typical hazards include toys that contain high levels of lead, electronic products that can short circuit, overheat and cause a burns, or mislabeled products.
Well, you can add dangerous books to that list as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> issues product recalls when consumer products present an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death.  Typical hazards include toys that contain high levels of lead, electronic products that can short circuit, overheat and cause a burns, or mislabeled products.</p>
<p>Well, you can add <a href="http://recalls.justia.com/infants-and-children/books-and-accessories/10-104/">dangerous books</a> to that list as well.  When I first spotted the recall notice, I had thought that ink may have contained lead or that the books posed some other form of physical danger.  However, the true danger posed by books is knowledge or, more accurately, misknowledge.  Be assured that these books are not being recalled for being profane or indecent.  Instead, as the recall notice points out, &#8220;The books contain errors in the technical diagrams and wiring instructions that could lead consumer to incorrectly install or repair electrical wiring, posing an electrical shock or fire hazard to consumers.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s the prime directive for DIYers?  Don&#8217;t believe everything you read on the internet.  Now, we can also add don&#8217;t believe everything you read in a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/09/product-liability-laws-and-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swiss Court Slams Shut Barn Door</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/08/swiss-court-slams-shut-barn-door/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/08/swiss-court-slams-shut-barn-door/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swiss bank accounts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times: Swiss Regulators’ Demand of UBS Client Data Found Illegal. A Swiss court said Friday that the country’s financial regulator had broken the law when it ordered UBS to hand over data on nearly 300 clients suspected of evading taxes to U.S. authorities a year ago.
Too late.  Buried in the fourth paragraph:
[I]t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><p><strong>New York Times</strong>: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/business/global/09ubs.html">Swiss Regulators’ Demand of UBS Client Data Found Illegal</a>. A Swiss court said Friday that the country’s financial regulator had broken the law when it ordered UBS to hand over data on nearly 300 clients suspected of evading taxes to U.S. authorities a year ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>Too late.  Buried in the fourth paragraph:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>[I]t is far too late to halt the transmission of certain clients’ data[.]</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>No kidding.  If UBS sent its client data to the IRS via Outlook, maybe UBS can still <a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA010917601033.aspx">recall</a> its e-mail. <img src='http://law.onecle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Regardless of the Swiss court ruling, the damage to Swiss banking has already been done.  All the King&#8217;s horses and all the King&#8217;s men, won&#8217;t be able to restore the confidence in secret Swiss bank accounts again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/08/swiss-court-slams-shut-barn-door/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California DMV</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/08/california-dmv/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/08/california-dmv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have to visit a local California DMV office, make an appointment.  Even though you will still have to pick a number and wait in line, the line for people with appointments will likely be shorter than the line for people without appointments.  However, the DMV calendaring system is a bit non-intuitive. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you have to visit a local <a href="http://www.dmv.ca.gov/">California DMV</a> office, <a href="https://eg.dmv.ca.gov/foa/welcome.do?localeName=en">make an appointment</a>.  Even though you will still have to pick a number and wait in line, the line for people with appointments will likely be shorter than the line for people without appointments.  However, the DMV calendaring system is a bit non-intuitive.  Ideally, the DMV will let you select a date and it will offer available times.  However, that&#8217;s not the way the DMV works.  You have to pick a date and time, and the DMV will let you know whether that date and time is open.  Feels like playing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(game)">Battleship</a>.  Just guessing different dates and times and looking for a hit.</p>
<p><img src="http://law.onecle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ca-dmv-technician.jpg" alt="" title="ca-dmv-technician" width="400" height="533" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-318" />
<p>Not sure why the DMV calls its employees <A href="http://www.google.com/dictionary?aq=f&#038;langpair=en%7Cen&#038;hl=en&#038;q=technician">technicians</a>.  If it was the person inspecting a vehicle, I will understand.  But, the guy handing out wait tickets?</p>
<p><img src="http://law.onecle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ca-dmv-bingo.jpg" alt="" title="ca-dmv-bingo" width="400" height="533" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-319" />
<p>After you get your bingo ticket, you take a seat and wait for the announcer to call out your winning combination.  If you owe money, be prepared.  Unlike the rest of the world, the DMV does not accept credit cards!  Cash, check or <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/your-money/credit-and-debit-cards/05visa.html">debit cards</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/08/california-dmv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online California MCLE</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/06/online-california-mcle/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/06/online-california-mcle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legal practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three years ago, I completed my California MCLE requirements through LACBA&#8217;s CLE-in-a-box program.  Basically, for the current non-member price of $249, you will receive a box of CDs containing 25 hours CLE courses to be completed at your convenience.  For quite a bit more, you can get these same courses pre-loaded on an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Three years ago, I completed my California MCLE requirements through LACBA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.lacba.org/showpage.cfm?pageid=9858">CLE-in-a-box</a> program.  Basically, for the current non-member price of $249, you will receive a box of CDs containing 25 hours CLE courses to be completed at your convenience.  For quite a bit more, you can get these same courses pre-loaded on an <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/">Apple iPod Nano</a> or an <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/">Apple iPod Shuffle</a>.</p>
<p>This time around, I&#8217;m trying MCLEZ&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mclez.com/cle/shop/view_bundle/California_Super_Bundle_Promotion">California Super Bundle Promotion</a> for $99.  MCLEZ offers 25 hours of California MCLE credit via online audio and video programs.  The programs play through a standard flash-based player that is compatible with both Macs and PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2010/01/06/online-california-mcle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pedro Nava Seeks to Punish Witnesses of Violent Crimes</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/17/pedro-nava-seeks-to-punish-witnesses-of-violent-crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/17/pedro-nava-seeks-to-punish-witnesses-of-violent-crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inside Bay Area reports that Assemblymember Pedro Nava will be introducing new legislation to punish witnesses of violent crimes.  Do legislators have to approach every single problem with a hammer?
Someone needs to think this through very carefully.  Right now, there is no upside to being a witness.  If you report the crime, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/dailyreview/localnews/ci_14011486">Inside Bay Area</a> reports that Assemblymember Pedro Nava will be introducing new legislation to <a href="http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a35/Pressroom/Press/20091216AD35PR01.aspx">punish witnesses</a> of violent crimes.  Do legislators have to approach every single problem with a hammer?</p>
<p>Someone needs to think this through very carefully.  Right now, there is no upside to being a witness.  If you report the crime, you face real problems with <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/12/14/on-snitches-and-stitches-in-philly/">witness intimidation</a>.  And, from the Broadcom saga, witness intimidation isn&#8217;t the sole province of the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/12/16/judge-cormac-carney-the-left-coasts-jed-rakoff/">mob</a>.</p>
<p>It will be a great day in America when the police starts Mirandizing witnesses before interviewing them.  I think that will really encourage them to open up.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/17/pedro-nava-seeks-to-punish-witnesses-of-violent-crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Meaning of Christmas</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/10/the-spirit-of-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/10/the-spirit-of-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I saw A Charlie Brown Christmas on ABC.  The highlight is Linus&#8217; monologue at the end when he explains the meaning of Christmas.  Evidently, some adults didn&#8217;t watch or learn from this Christmas special in their formative years.

The Salvation Army purports to &#8220;preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Earlier this week, I saw <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001CO32FI?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=oneclinc-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B001CO32FI">A Charlie Brown Christmas</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=oneclinc-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B001CO32FI" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> on ABC.  The highlight is Linus&#8217; monologue at the end when he explains the meaning of Christmas.  Evidently, some adults didn&#8217;t watch or learn from this Christmas special in their formative years.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="278"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/jAzzitWRcjgYS2iHaNF0GA"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/jAzzitWRcjgYS2iHaNF0GA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="480" height="278"></embed></object>
<p>The <a href="http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/www_usn_2.nsf/vw-local/About-us">Salvation Army</a> purports to &#8220;preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs in His name <strong>without discrimination</strong>.&#8221;  If that is the case, why is the Salvation Army checking on the <a href="http://www.immigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/12/is_santa_checking_the_immigrat.html">immigration status</a> of children during their toy drives?  Seriously.  WWJD.  Become a member of the border patrol? Talk about taking the Christ out of Christmas. Even <a href="http://www.noradsanta.org/en/index.html">Santa</a> delivers gifts to children around the world and I&#8217;m pretty sure he doesn&#8217;t share his naughty-or-nice list with the elves at <a href="http://www.ice.gov/">US Immigration and Customs Enforcement</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/10/the-spirit-of-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid in California</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/10/automotive-windshield-washer-fluid-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/10/automotive-windshield-washer-fluid-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law2.onecle.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you live in Los Angeles, Orange County or the San Francisco Bay Area, you probably refill your windshield washer fluid reservoir with the $1.00 jug of blue windshield washer fluid marked +32°.  Even if you use plain tap water, the weather really doesn&#8217;t get so cold that it will freeze your washer fluid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you live in Los Angeles, Orange County or the San Francisco Bay Area, you probably refill your windshield washer fluid reservoir with the $1.00 jug of blue windshield washer fluid marked +32°.  Even if you use plain tap water, the weather really doesn&#8217;t get so cold that it will freeze your washer fluid and crack your reservoir.  However, if you are planning a winter excursion to Lake Tahoe, you should be aware of how different laws can affect your trip.  First off, the California Department of Transportation provides <a href="http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/wntrdriv.htm">winter driving tips</a> and information regarding the state&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/chcontrl.htm">snow chain</a> laws.  To see whether an chain controls are in effect, visit the <a href="http://www.dot.ca.gov/cgi-bin/roads.cgi">road information</a> page. If you are using an iPhone or other mobile phone, bookmark the <a href="http://www.dot.ca.gov/cgi-bin/roadscell.cgi">Road Conditions (Mobile)</a> page.  Caltrans also provides <a href="http://www.video.dot.ca.gov/">live traffic cameras</a>, which loads OK on a PC.  Not so hot on a Mac unless I paste in the URL for the particular camera into QuickTime Player 7 or WIndow Media Player.  Not sure why it doesn&#8217;t work the same for newest QuickTime Player 10.</p>
<p>Anyways, for the windshield washer fluid, I was searching around for an under 32&deg; winter mix.  I stopped at Pep Boys, Kragen, Target, and Wal-Mart.  No one was carrying it because California regulates <a href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/consprod/regact/awwf/awwf.htm">automotive windshield washer fluid</a>.  Basically, you cannot prepare in advance like a reasonably prudent person would and refill your automotive windshield washer fluid reservoir with a winter mix of windshield washer fluid.  Instead, you have to wait until you reach <a href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/consprod/regact/awwf/type-a-areas-of-ca.jpg">sanctuary</a>, a/k/a a Type A area.  That or buy it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/">online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/10/automotive-windshield-washer-fluid-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Woods Congressional Gold Medal</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-congressional-gold-medal/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-congressional-gold-medal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiger woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law2.onecle.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think all the findings remain true; however, Congressman Baca might want to strike #6 about breaking barriers (fire hydrant?) with grace and dignity.

HR 1244 IH

111th CONGRESS


1st Session


H. R. 1244

To provide for the award of a gold medal on behalf of the Congress to Tiger Woods, in recognition of his service to the Nation in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I think all the findings remain true; however, Congressman Baca might want to strike #6 about breaking barriers (fire hydrant?) with grace and dignity.</p>
<hr />
<p>HR 1244 IH</p>
<p><center><br />
111th CONGRESS<br />
</center><br />
<center><br />
1st Session<br />
</center><br />
<center><br />
<b>H. R. 1244</b><br />
</center></p>
<p>To provide for the award of a gold medal on behalf of the Congress to Tiger Woods, in recognition of his service to the Nation in promoting excellence and good sportsmanship, and in breaking barriers with grace and dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people.</p>
<p><center><br />
<b>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</b><br />
</center><br />
<center></p>
<p>March 2, 2009</p>
<p></center></p>
<p>Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services</p>
<hr />
<center><br />
<b>A BILL</b><br />
</center></p>
<p>To provide for the award of a gold medal on behalf of the Congress to Tiger Woods, in recognition of his service to the Nation in promoting excellence and good sportsmanship, and in breaking barriers with grace and dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people.</p>
<ul>
<li style="list-style: none"><em>Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,</em></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>SECTION 1. FINDINGS.</strong></p>
<p>        Congress finds the following:</p>
<div style="margin-left:2em;">
<p>(1) Although Tiger Woods is only 33 years old and is going on his 13th full year as a professional golfer, he has won 87 tournaments (65 of which were on the Professional Golf Association (PGA) tour), including the 1997, 2001, 2002, and 2005 Masters Tournaments, the 1999, 2000, 2006, and 2007 PGA Championships, the 2000, 2002, and 2008 U.S. Open championships, and the 2000, 2005, and 2006 British Open Championships.</p>
<p>(2) Tiger Woods is the 5th player in history to win all 4 major championships (Masters, PGA Championship, U.S. Open, and British Open), joining the ranks of Gene Sarazen, Ben Hogan, Gary Player, and Jack Nicklaus.</p>
<p>(3) With his second Masters victory in 2001, Tiger Woods became the first player ever to hold all 4 major championships at the same time.</p>
<p>(4) Tiger Woods is the career victories leader among active players on the PGA tour, and is the career money list leader.</p>
<p>(5) Tiger Woods can be compared with Jack Nicklaus as being one of the greatest golfers of all time.</p>
<p>(6) Tiger Woods has broken barriers with grace and dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people, regardless of race, color, or creed.</p>
<p>(7) Tiger Woods has inspired countless people of all ages, impressing upon them that their hopes, dreams, and prayers may be achieved through hard work, persistence, education, and good sportsmanship.</p>
<p>(8) Tiger Woods established the Tiger Woods Foundation in 1996, which financially supports communities and organizations that nurture family values and adults&#8217; involvement in children&#8217;s lives.</p>
<p>(9) The Tiger Woods Foundation hosts clinics, which give thousands of youngsters golf lessons and draw attention and support to the organizations that allow inner-city children access to golf.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.</strong></p>
<div style="margin-left:2em;">
<p>(a) Presentation Authorized- The Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate shall make appropriate arrangements for the presentation, on behalf of the Congress, of a gold medal of appropriate design to Tiger Woods in recognition of his service to the Nation in promoting excellence and good sportsmanship, and in breaking barriers with grace and dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people.</p>
<p>(b) Design and Striking- For the purpose of the presentation referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Treasury (in this Act referred to as the `Secretary&#8217;) shall strike a gold medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions to be determined by the Secretary.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>SEC. 3. DUPLICATE MEDALS.</strong></p>
<div style="margin-left:2em;">
<p>Under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, the Secretary may strike duplicate medals in bronze of the gold medal struck pursuant to section 2 and sell such duplicate medals at a price sufficient to cover the costs of the duplicate medals (including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses) and the cost of the gold medal.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>SEC. 4. NATIONAL MEDALS.</strong></p>
<div style="margin-left:2em;">
<p>The medals struck under this Act are national medals for purposes of chapter 51 of title 31, United States Code.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF CHARGES AGAINST FUND; PROCEEDS OF SALE.</strong></p>
<div style="margin-left:2em;">
<p>(a) Authorization- There is authorized to be charged against the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund an amount not to exceed $30,000 to pay for the cost of the medals authorized by this Act.</p>
<p>(b) Proceeds of Sale- Amounts received from the sale of duplicate bronze medals under section 3 shall be deposited in the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-congressional-gold-medal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaxico Burress</title>
		<link>http://law.onecle.com/2009/09/24/plaxico-burress/</link>
		<comments>http://law.onecle.com/2009/09/24/plaxico-burress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaxico burress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even Second Amendment haters must be scratching their heads at this one.  Two years in prison for second degree criminal possession of a weapon and second degree reckless endangerment.  Wow!  Is his offense of the same magnitude as that committed by Michael Vick?  No.  Regardless of the law, on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Even <a href="http://law.onecle.com/constitution/amendment-02/index.html">Second Amendment</a> haters must be scratching their heads at this one.  <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-nfl-report23-2009sep23,0,4132191.story">Two years</a> in prison for <a href="http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0265.03_265.03.html">second degree criminal possession of a weapon</a> and <a href="http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0120.20_120.20.html">second degree reckless endangerment</a>.  Wow!  Is his offense of the same magnitude as that committed by Michael Vick?  No.  Regardless of the law, on a basic fairness level, how do you send a man to jail for two years for accidentally shooting himself with a concealed weapon, illegal or otherwise?  Sure, if he shot someone else, I would understand.  But he shot himself!!  Is New York any safer with Plaxico Burress off the streets for two years?  I doubt it.  What a waste of taxpayer money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.onecle.com/2009/09/24/plaxico-burress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
