onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

US Supreme Court
US Tax Court
Board of Patent Appeals

State Laws

Alabama
Arizona
California
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Nevada
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Texas
Virginia
Washington

US Code

1 USC - General Provisions
2 USC - The Congress
3 USC - The President
4 USC - Flag and Seal
5 USC - Gov't Organization
6 USC - Domestic Security
7 USC - Agriculture
8 USC - Aliens and Nationality
9 USC - Arbitration
10 USC - Armed Forces
11 USC - Bankruptcy
12 USC - Banks and Banking
13 USC - Census
14 USC - Coast Guard
15 USC - Commerce and Trade
16 USC - Conservation
17 USC - Copyrights
18 USC - Crimes
19 USC - Customs Duties
20 USC - Education
21 USC - Food and Drugs
22 USC - Foreign Relations
23 USC - Highways
24 USC - Hospitals
25 USC - Indians
26 USC - Internal Revenue Code
27 USC - Intoxicating Liquors
28 USC - Judiciary
29 USC - Labor
30 USC - Mineral Lands
31 USC - Money and Finance
32 USC - National Guard
33 USC - Navigation
34 USC - Navy (repealed)
35 USC - Patents
36 USC - Patriotic Societies
37 USC - Uniformed Services
38 USC - Veterans' Benefits
39 USC - Postal Service
40 USC - Public Property
41 USC - Public Contracts
42 USC - Public Health
43 USC - Public Lands
44 USC - Public Printing
45 USC - Railroads
46 USC - Shipping
47 USC - Telecom
48 USC - Territories
49 USC - Transportation
50 USC - War

US Constitution

Preamble
Art. I - Legislative
Art. II - Executive
Art. III - Judicial
Art. IV - States' Relations
Art. V - Mode of Amendment
Art. VI - Prior Debts
Art VII - Ratification

Report of Irregularities to Any Person or Entity Involved in Scoring or Administration - Mich. Comp. Laws Section 380.1279d

Legal Research Home > Michigan Laws > School Code Of 1976 > Report of Irregularities to Any Person or Entity Involved in Scoring or Administration - Mich. Comp. Laws Section 380.1279d

380.1279d Report of irregularities to any person or entity involved in scoring or administration.

Sec. 1279d.

If the superintendent of public instruction or any other state agency has reason to suspect that there are irregularities in a school district's or public school academy's administration of, or preparation of pupils for, a Michigan educational assessment program (MEAP) test or the Michigan merit examination, the superintendent of public instruction or other state agency shall not report the suspected irregularities to any person or entity not involved in the scoring or administration of the test before notifying the school district or public school academy of the suspected irregularities and allowing at least 5 business days for school officials to respond.


History: Add. 2002, Act 640, Imd. Eff. Dec. 23, 2002 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 399, Imd. Eff. Oct. 15, 2004 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 596, Imd. Eff. Jan. 5, 2005
Compiler's Notes: Former MCL 380.1279d, which pertained to the student portfolio, was repealed by Act 289 of 1995, Eff. July 1, 1996.For transfer of powers and duties relating to Michigan educational assessment program from department of treasury to superintendent of public instruction by type II transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2003-2, compiled at MCL 388.997.
Popular Name: Act 451

Section:  Previous  380.1278  380.1278a  380.1278b  380.1279  380.1279a  380.1279b  380.1279c  380.1279d  380.1279e  380.1279g  380.1280  380.1280a  380.1280b  380.1280c  380.1280e  Next

Last modified: March 17, 2013


Business Contracts