|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Use of force for the protection of property - 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 507Legal Research Home > Pennsylvania Statutes Sponsored Links
§ 507. Use of force for the protection of property.
(a) Use of force justifiable for protection of property.--
The use of force upon or toward the person of another is
justifiable when the actor believes that such force is
immediately necessary:
(1) to prevent or terminate an unlawful entry or other
trespass upon land or a trespass against or the unlawful
carrying away of tangible movable property, if such land or
movable property is, or is believed by the actor to be, in
his possession or in the possession of another person for
whose protection he acts; or
(2) to effect an entry or reentry upon land or to retake
tangible movable property, if:
(i) the actor believes that he or the person by
whose authority he acts or a person from whom he or such
other person derives title was unlawfully dispossessed of
such land or movable property and is entitled to
possession; and
(ii) (A) the force is used immediately or on fresh
pursuit after such dispossession; or
(B) the actor believes that the person against
whom he uses force has no claim of right to the
possession of the property and, in the case of land,
the circumstances, as the actor believes them to be,
are of such urgency that it would be an exceptional
hardship to postpone the entry or reentry until a
court order is obtained.
(b) Meaning of possession.--For the purpose of subsection
(a) of this section:
(1) A person who has parted with the custody of property
to another who refuses to restore it to him is no longer in
possession, unless the property is movable and was and still
is located on land in his possession.
(2) A person who has been dispossessed of land does not
regain possession thereof merely by setting foot thereon.
(3) A person who has a license to use or occupy real
property is deemed to be in possession thereof except against
the licensor acting under claim of right.
(c) Limitations on justifiable use of force.--
(1) The use of force is justifiable under this section
only if the actor first requests the person against whom such
force is used to desist from his interference with the
property, unless the actor believes that:
(i) such request would be useless;
(ii) it would be dangerous to himself or another
person to make the request; or
(iii) substantial harm will be done to the physical
condition of the property which is sought to be protected
before the request can effectively be made.
(2) The use of force to prevent or terminate a trespass
is not justifiable under this section if the actor knows that
the exclusion of the trespasser will expose him to
substantial danger of serious bodily injury.
(3) The use of force to prevent an entry or reentry upon
land or the recaption of movable property is not justifiable
under this section, although the actor believes that such
reentry or caption is unlawful, if:
(i) the reentry or recaption is made by or on behalf
of a person who was actually dispossessed of the
property; and
(ii) it is otherwise justifiable under subsection
(a)(2).
(4) (i) The use of deadly force is justifiable under
this section if:
(A) there has been an entry into the actor's
dwelling;
(B) the actor neither believes nor has reason to
believe that the entry is lawful; and
(C) the actor neither believes nor has reason to
believe that force less than deadly force would be
adequate to terminate the entry.
(ii) If the conditions of justification provided in
subparagraph (i) have not been met, the use of deadly
force is not justifiable under this section unless the
actor believes that:
(A) the person against whom the force is used is
attempting to dispossess him of his dwelling
otherwise than under a claim of right to its
possession; or
(B) such force is necessary to prevent the
commission of a felony in the dwelling.
(d) Use of confinement as protective force.--The
justification afforded by this section extends to the use of
confinement as protective force only if the actor takes all
reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he
knows that he can do so with safety to the property, unless the
person confined has been arrested on a charge of crime.
(e) Use of device to protect property.--The justification
afforded by this section extends to the use of a device for the
purpose of protecting property only if:
(1) the device is not designed to cause or known to
create a substantial risk of causing death or serious bodily
injury;
(2) the use of the particular device to protect the
property from entry or trespass is reasonable under the
circumstances, as the actor believes them to be; and
(3) the device is one customarily used for such a
purpose or reasonable care is taken to make known to probable
intruders the fact that it is used.
(f) Use of force to pass wrongful obstructor.--The use of
force to pass a person whom the actor believes to be
intentionally or knowingly and unjustifiably obstructing the
actor from going to a place to which he may lawfully go is
justifiable, if:
(1) the actor believes that the person against whom he
uses force has no claim of right to obstruct the actor;
(2) the actor is not being obstructed from entry or
movement on land which he knows to be in the possession or
custody of the person obstructing him, or in the possession
or custody of another person by whose authority the
obstructor acts, unless the circumstances, as the actor
believes them to be, are of such urgency that it would not be
reasonable to postpone the entry or movement on such land
until a court order is obtained; and
(3) the force used is not greater than it would be
justifiable if the person obstructing the actor were using
force against him to prevent his passage.
(Dec. 19, 1980, P.L.1310, No.235, eff. imd.)
1980 Amendment. Act 235 amended subsec. (c).
Cross References. Section 507 is referred to in section 505
of this title.
Section: Previous 315 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 901 902 903 904 Next
Last modified: November 27, 2007 |