|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Injury to business or reputation; dilution - 54 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1124Legal Research Home > Pennsylvania Statutes Sponsored Links
§ 1124. Injury to business or reputation; dilution.
The owner of a mark which is famous in this Commonwealth
shall be entitled, subject to the principles of equity and upon
such terms as the court deems reasonable, to an injunction
against another person's commercial use of a mark or trade name
if such use begins after the mark has become famous and causes
dilution of the distinctive quality of the mark and to obtain
such other relief as is provided in this section. In determining
whether a mark is distinctive and famous, a court may consider
factors such as, but not limited to:
(1) The degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness
of the mark in this Commonwealth.
(2) The duration and extent of use of the mark in
connection with the goods and services with which the mark is
used.
(3) The duration and extent of advertising and publicity
of the mark in this Commonwealth.
(4) The geographical extent of the trading area in which
the mark is used.
(5) The channels of trade for the goods or services with
which the mark is used.
(6) The degree of recognition of the mark in the trading
areas and channels of trade in this Commonwealth used by the
mark's owner and the person against whom the injunction is
sought.
(7) The nature and extent of use of the same or similar
marks by third parties.
(8) Whether the mark is the subject of a registration in
this Commonwealth or a Federal registration under the act of
March 3, 1881 (21 Stat. 502) or the act of February 20, 1905
(33 Stat. 724), repealed by the Trademark Act of 1946 (60
Stat. 427, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.), or on the principal
register.
In an action brought under this section, the owner of a famous
mark shall be entitled only to injunctive relief in this
Commonwealth unless the person against whom the injunctive
relief is sought willfully intended to trade on the owner's
reputation or to cause dilution of the famous mark. If such
willful intent is proven, the owner shall also be entitled to
the remedies set forth in this chapter, subject to the
discretion of the court and the principles of equity. The
following shall not be actionable under this section:
(1) Fair use of a famous mark by another person in
comparative commercial advertising or promotion to identify
the competing goods or services of the owner of the famous
mark.
(2) Noncommercial use of a mark.
(3) All forms of news reporting and news commentary.
(June 18, 1998, P.L.518, No.73, eff. 60 days)
Section: Previous 1113 1114 1115 1116 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1301 1302 1311 1312 1313 Next
Last modified: November 27, 2007 |