<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law and Legal Research &#187; cell phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law2.onecle.com/tag/cell-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://law2.onecle.com</link>
	<description>Lawyers, Legal Websites, Legal News and Legal Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Text Message Prices</title>
		<link>http://law2.onecle.com/2009/06/17/text-message-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://law2.onecle.com/2009/06/17/text-message-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text message]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, the Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommitee examined the state of competition in the cell phone industry.
Senator Kohl stated that &#8220;[f]rom 2006 to 2008, the price of sending and receiving a text message among the four largest cell phone carriers increased by 100% from 10 to 20 cents per message&#8221; even though &#8220;the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Recently, the <a href="http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/subcommittees/antitrust.cfm">Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommitee</a> examined the <a href="http://www.senate.gov/fplayers/CommPlayer/commFlashPlayer.cfm?fn=judiciary061609&#038;st=xxx">state of competition in the cell phone industry</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://kohl.senate.gov/">Senator Kohl</a> stated that &#8220;[f]rom 2006 to 2008, the price of sending and receiving a text message among the four largest cell phone carriers increased by 100% from 10 to 20 cents per message&#8221; even though &#8220;the cost to the phone companies to carry text messages is minimal, estimated to be less than a penny per message, and has not increased.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the funny part.  Verizon and AT&#038;T argued that the price increases only affect a small percentage of subscribers because most people purchase a text message package instead of paying a la carte.   Actually, the price increases affect all subscribers because if the carriers charged 2 cents instead of 20 cents per message, then most subscribers probably would not purchase a package. Or, in the alternative, text message packages would be significantly cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law2.onecle.com/2009/06/17/text-message-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using a Cell Phone While Driving in California</title>
		<link>http://law2.onecle.com/2008/10/08/using-a-cell-phone-while-driving-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://law2.onecle.com/2008/10/08/using-a-cell-phone-while-driving-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.onecle.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just over three months ago, California started prohibiting the use of cell phones while driving.  However, the law allowed drivers 18 and over to use a cell phone provided that they also used a hands-free device.  So, I was quite surprised to see other drivers talking on cell phones these past few days. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Just over three months ago, California started prohibiting the use of cell phones while driving.  However, the law allowed drivers 18 and over to use a cell phone provided that they also used a hands-free device.  So, I was quite surprised to see other drivers talking on cell phones these past few days.  You can&#8217;t miss the unmistakeable sign:  right hand glued to the right ear while driving.  This morning, <a href="http://www.PaloAltoOnline.com/news/show_story.php?id=9574">Palo Alto Online</a> reported that the CHP had cited over 20,000 drivers for talking on a cell phone.  Although the base fine is $20, the <a href="http://www.dmv.ca.gov/cellularphonelaws/index.htm">DMV</a> states that &#8220;[w]ith the addition of penalty assessments, the fine can be more than triple the base fine amount.&#8221;  In these times of financial crisis, we can thank our fellow drivers for chipping in an extra $400,000 &#8211; $1,200,000 to help out the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law2.onecle.com/2008/10/08/using-a-cell-phone-while-driving-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
