Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1, 3 (1993) (per curiam)

Legal Research Home > United States Supreme Court > 510 U.S. > Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1, 3 (1993) (per curiam)

Cite as: 510 U. S. 1 (1993)

Stevens, J., dissenting

Justice Stevens, dissenting.

Adhering to the views expressed in the dissenting opinions in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928, 931 (1983), In re McDonald, 489 U. S. 180, 185 (1989), and Wrenn v. Benson, 490 U. S. 89, 92 (1989), I would deny these petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis. In the future, however, I shall not encumber the record by noting my dissent from similar orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis, absent exceptional circumstances.

3

Last modified: October 4, 2007