{"id":384,"date":"2010-08-18T02:04:31","date_gmt":"2010-08-18T08:04:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/law.onecle.com\/?p=384"},"modified":"2010-08-18T02:04:31","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T08:04:31","slug":"formula-restaurants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/2010\/08\/18\/formula-restaurants\/","title":{"rendered":"Formula Restaurants"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/nation\/2010-08-17-chain-restaurants_N.htm\">USA Today<\/a> reports that a group of investors are challenging a Springdale, Utah ordinance that bans &#8220;formula restaurants&#8221; to preserve the charm of the local community.  Justia has the <a href=\"http:\/\/docs.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/district-courts\/utah\/utdce\/2:2010cv00559\/75685\/2\/\">Complaint<\/a> from <a href=\"http:\/\/dockets.justia.com\/docket\/utah\/utdce\/2:2010cv00559\/75685\/\">Izzy Poco v. Town of Springdale et al.<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Springdale Town Code 10-2-2:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>FORMULA RESTAURANT OR DELICATESSEN: A business which is required by contractual or other arrangement to provide any of the following: substantially identical named menu items, packaging, food preparation methods, employee uniforms, interior decor, signage, exterior design, or name as any other restaurant or delicatessen in any other location.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Springdale Town Code Section 10-3A-5:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>C.  Standards for conditional uses in agricultural zone:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:1em;\">1. Restaurants:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:2em;\">d.  Formula restaurants are prohibited.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Springdale Town Code Section 10-22-3:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Subject to the provisions of section 10-21-1 of this title, the following uses are recognized to be incompatible with the general plan, because of the limited amount of private land available within the town&#8217;s boundaries; the large size or scale required of such uses; excessive noise, odor or light emissions; their excessive use of limited resources and the undue burden they place on public utilities and services, or because they are of a character hereby found to be in conflict with the town&#8217;s general plan:<\/p>\n<p>Formula restaurants and formula delicatessens.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I don&#8217;t understand the ordinance.  In fact, it reminds me of San Francisco&#8217;s strange obsession with <a href=\"http:\/\/articles.sfgate.com\/2008-05-06\/news\/17155004_1_chain-stores-hawken-paint-store\">chain stores<\/a>.  At the end of the day, unless a business is operating on federal, state or local lands, I don&#8217;t understand why one restaurant is permitted, but another is not.  After all, we&#8217;re talking about sandwiches and not <a href=\"http:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/us\/475\/41\/\">adult motion picture theaters<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The food industry is challenging enough.  Let the market decide whether the local or visiting population really dislikes formula restaurants.  And, in this day and age of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.yelp.com\/search?find_desc=restaurant&#038;ns=1&#038;find_loc=springdale%2C+ut\">Yelp<\/a>, mom-and-pop restaurants that deliver quality food and service can compete toe-to-toe with the so-called formula restaurants with their national advertising budgets.  And, if a mom-and-pop restaurant cannot beat a chain restaurant, maybe a visit from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fox.com\/kitchennightmares\/\">Gordon Ramsay<\/a> would be in order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>USA Today reports that a group of investors are challenging a Springdale, Utah ordinance that bans &#8220;formula restaurants&#8221; to preserve the charm of the local community. Justia has the Complaint from Izzy Poco v. Town of Springdale et al.. Springdale Town Code 10-2-2: FORMULA RESTAURANT OR DELICATESSEN: A business which is required by contractual or [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8,12],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=384"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":390,"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384\/revisions\/390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.onecle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}