Ex parte MICHAEL A. REPKA, et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 94-1540                                                                                        
             Application 07/861,558                                                                                    


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. '  134 from the final rejection of claims 1                      
             through 33, all the claims pending in the application.                                                    
                    Claim 27, the broadest independent claim pending, is illustrative of the subject                   
             matter on appeal and reads as follows:                                                                    
                    27.  A bioadhesive composition comprising from about 3 to 15% by weight of a                       
             water-soluble salt of a copolymer of a lower alkyl vinyl ether and maleic acid or                         
             anhydride and from about 85 to 97% by weight of polyethylene glycol (PEG).                                

                    The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                    
             Martin                      4,307,075            Dec. 22, 1981                                            
             Keith et al. (Keith)               4,764,378            Aug. 16, 1988                                     
             Blackman et al. (Blackman)         4,883,660            Nov. 28, 1989                                     
             Browning                           4,948,580            Aug. 14, 1990                                     
             Repka et al. (Repka)               5,112,620            May 12, 1992                                      

                    Claims 1 through 33 stand rejected under the judicially created doctrine of                        
             obviousness-type double patenting as unpatentable over claims 1 through 15 of Repka.                      
             In addition, claims 1 through 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. '  103 as unpatentable                    
             over Browning in view of Blackman, Keith, and Martin.  We affirm the double patenting                     
             rejection and reverse the prior art rejection.                                                            






                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007