Ex parte ROBERT R. BARTLETT - Page 5




          Appeal No. 94-2990                                                          
          Application 07/932,577                                                      



                                    DELIBERATIONS                                     

               Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation              
          and review of the following materials:                                      
                    (1) The instant specification, including all of the               
          claims on appeal;                                                           
                    (2) Appellant’s main Brief and Reply Brief before the             
          Board;                                                                      
                    (3) The Examiner’s Answer and the communication mailed            
          by the examiner February 22, 1994; and                                      
                    (4) The above-cited references relied on by both                  
          appellant and the examiner.                                                 



               On consideration of the record, including the above-listed             
          materials, we reverse the examiner’s rejection under 35 USC                 
          § 103.                                                                      

                                     DISCUSSION                                       

               Claims 11 through 15, 22 and 23 are directed to a method of            
          treating hyperacute rejection reactions of an organ recipient to            
          a transplanted organ.  Based on our review of the record, we find           

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007