THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WEI H. CHANG, SHAW-CHANG
CHU and JAMES A. JOHNSON, Jr.
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2995
Application 07/976,8271
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and GARRIS and
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 1, 3 through 8 and 10 through 17 as
amended subsequent to the final rejection. The only other claim
remaining in the application, which is claim 9, stands withdrawn
from further consideration by the examiner.
1 Application for patent filed November 16, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007