THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CARMEN RAPISARDA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0688
Application 08/105,4651
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 19 through 29, which are all of the claims
1Application for patent filed August 9, 1993. According to
applicant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/806,925, filed December 11, 1991, which is Abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007