THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NAOKI KOYAMA, YOSHIHIRO HAMAKAWA, ISAMU YUITOO,
KANJI KAWAKAMI, KAZUO SHIIKI, MASAHIRO KITADA
__________
Appeal No. 96-0775
Application 07/990,7691
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2, 3, 9
and 10. In an Amendment After Final (Paper Number 13), claims 2,
3, 9 and 10 were amended.
1Application for patent filed December 15, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007