THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CRAIG A. ANDERSON and
JAMES T. GRIGSBY
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2771
Application 08/239,3341
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, LYDDANE
and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal
to allow of claim 13, which was amended subsequent to final
rejection (Paper No. 8). Claims 1-12 have been canceled.
Appellants claimed invention is directed to the
combination of a window having a nail fin secured to the frame of
the window. The nail fin includes a fold line which allows the
1Application for patent filed May 6, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007