THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DINESH M. BHAT
______________
Appeal No. 94-0605
Application 07/807,7501
_______________
HEARD: June 9, 1997
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
On Request For Reconsideration
Appellant requests reconsideration of our decision dated
June 30, 1997, wherein we affirmed the decision of the
examiner based on his rejection of appealed claims 93 through
138 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 as being unpatentable over Gatward.
We have carefully considered appellant’s request but are
unconvinced of error in our decision. Thus, we decline to
make any changes in our prior decision for the reasons which
follow.
1 Application for patent filed December 17, 1991. According
to applicant, this application is a continuation of
application for patent 07/598,995, filed October 10, 1990.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007