Ex parte SEGUIN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 94-1325                                                          
          Application No. 07/882,928                                                  


          approved for entry (Paper No. 9) cancelled claims 1 through 4 and           
          8 through                                                                   


          10, and added new claim 11. Accordingly, we have before us claims           
          5 through 7, and 11. 2                                                      
                    Appellant's invention pertains to a method of repairing           
          cracks in the metal of a rail of a railway track or wheel of a              
          rail vehicle. A basic understanding of the invention can be                 
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 5, a copy of which                
          appears below.                                                              
                         5. A method of repairing cracks in                           
                    the metal of a rail of a railway track or                         
                    a wheel of a rail vehicle, the method                             
                    comprising:                                                       
                    generating at least one intense beam of                           
                    energy capable of generating a vapour                             
                    space in the metal;                                               



           In a grandparent application Serial No. 07/103,638, a2                                                                      
          decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI)            
          was rendered in Appeal No. 89-3348 dated January 26, 1990 in which          
          the same art now applied was reviewed. In a parent application              
          Serial No. 07/431,084, the BPAI rendered a decision in Appeal No.           
          91-0995 dated October 4, 1991 again reviewing the same art as is            
          now applied in the present appeal. However, in the present case we          
          have before us different claimed subject matter and new                     
          declaration evidence.                                                       
                                            2                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007