Ex parte SYDANSK - Page 2




          Appeal No. 94-1451                                                          
          Application 07/839,640                                                      


               This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final           
          rejection of claims 1, 3-9 and 14-19.  Claims 2 and 10-13 have              
          been allowed.                                                               
               Claims 1 and 3 are representative and are reproduced below:            
               1.   A foam composition for improving sweep efficiency in a            
          subterranean oil-bearing formation comprising:                              
               a water-soluble, carboxylate-containing polymer selected               
          from a synthetic polymer or a biopolymer;                                   
               a trivalent chromium-containing crosslinking agent;                    
               a surfactant;                                                          
               an aqueous liquid solvent, the combination of said polymer,            
          said crosslinking agent and said surfactant in said solvent                 
          defining a liquid foaming composition; and                                  
               a foaming gas.                                                         
               3.   The composition of claim 1 wherein said polymer is a              
          biopolymer selected from xanthan gum, guar gum, succinoglycan,              
          scleroglucan, polyvinylsaccharides, carboxymethylcellulose, o-              
          carboxychitosans, hydroxyethylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose,            
          modified starches or mixtures thereof.                                      
               The reference of record relied upon by the examiner is:                
          Stern                    5,124,363                Jun. 23, 1992             
                                                  (filed Mar. 26, 1991)               
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          unpatentable over Stern.                                                    
               Essentially for the reasons set forth by the examiner in his           
          answer, we affirm this rejection.                                           


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007