THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte NOBORU ONISHI, KUNIHIRO HAYASHIDA
and KANJI MAMIYA
________________
Appeal No. 94-1942
Application 07/773,6031
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and WEIMAR, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting
claims 11 through 18, which are all of the claims remaining in
the application.
Claim 11, which is illustrative of the subject matter on
appeal, reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed November 20, 1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007