THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PAUL C. CHIENG, DEBORAH J. BRAME
and ALEXANDER H. T. CHU
__________
Appeal No. 94-2414
Application 07/911,5041
__________
HEARD: June 11, 1997
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and THIERSTEIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 32 and 34-46. Claims 31 and 33 stand
withdrawn from further reconsideration as directed to a non-
elected invention.
1Application for patent filed July 10, 1992. According to
appellants, this application is a division of Application
07/342,547 filed April 24, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,158,758
issued October 27, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007