THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALBERT RIJKEBOER
and ROELOF D. HONG
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2858
Application 07/873,7151
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 2 through 47, 49 and 53.
Representative claim 53 is reproduced below:
53. A process for the production of aluminum hydroxide
1 Application for patent filed April 22, 1992. According to applicants,
the application is a continuation of Application 07/489,560, filed March 7, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007