THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GEOFFREY W. SMITH,
PATRICK J. MULQUEEN,
ERIC S. PATERSON,
and JOHN CUFFE
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2881
Application 07/790,7291
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
claims 2, 3, 6, 7 and 9-11, the only claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
1Application for patent filed November 8, 1991. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/469,427, filed April 5, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007