THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MIYOJI HANAOKA, HISAO EKIMOTO,
FUMIKO KOBAYASHI, YUKIO IRIE, KATSUTOSHI TAKAHASHI,
MASANOBU SUZUKI, TAKESHI NAKANISHI, OSAMU KOGAWA,
and KEIZOU ISHIKAWA
__________
Appeal No. 94-3012
Application 07/851,8531
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, ELLIS, and OWENS Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed March 16, 1992. According to
the applicants this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/784,699, filed October 30, 1991, now abandoned,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/621,848, filed
December 4, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007