THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RALPH J. STOLLE
and LEE R. BECK
____________
Appeal No. 94-3539
Application 07/655,8121
____________
HEARD: February 3, 1997
____________
Before GRON, WEIFFENBACH, and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
Application for patent filed February 15, 1991. According1
to applicants, this application is a division of Application
07/001,842, filed January 9, 1987, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/546,162, filed October 27,
1983, now U.S. Patent No. 4,636,384, issued January 13, 1987; which
is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/384,625, filed June 3,
1982, now abandoned. Application 07/001,842 also is a continuation-
in-part of Application 06/622,130, filed June 19, 1984, now U.S.
Patent No. 4,748,018, issued May 31, 1988; which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 06/577,804, filed February 7, 1984, now
abandoned.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007