THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD G. HYATT, JR.
DOUGLAS TRENT
and CHARLES HALL
____________
Appeal No. 95-0143
Application 07/865,8491
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 20, all of the claims present in the
application. Appellants’ invention relates to electronic
1Application for patent filed April 9, 1992. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/522,017, filed May 11, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007