Ex parte LE GROW et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-0222                                                             
          Application 08/145,553                                                         


               Claim 15 is representative of the subject matter on appeal                
          and reads as follows:                                                          
               15.  A composition comprising (i) from 30.0 to 97.8 percent               
          by weight of an alkylmethylsiloxane having the formula                         












          in which the sum of the integers x and y is four, five, or six,                
          with the proviso that x and y cannot be zero; and z is an integer              
          having a value of one of twelve; (ii) from 0.2 to fifty percent                
          by weight of a cyclopolysiloxane having the formula [(CH ) SiO]                
                                                                     32    a             
          in which a is an integer having a value of three to ten; and                   
          (iii) two to twenty percent by weight of a silicone gum selected               
          from the group consisting of silanol endblocked polydimethyl-                  
          siloxane gums having the formula HO(CH ) SiO[(CH ) SiO] Si(CH ) OH,            
                                                  32       3 2    n     32               
          and polydimethylsiloxane gums having the formula                               
          (CH ) SiO[(CH ) SiO] Si(CH ) , in which n is an integer having a               
             3 3       32    n     3 3                                                   
          value of from five thousand to fifty thousand.                                 
               The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:                 
          Pader                                4,364,837      Dec. 21, 1982              
          Bolich, Jr. et al. (Bolich)          4,902,499      Feb. 20, 1990              
          Cobb et al. (Cobb)                   4,906,459      Mar.  6, 1990              
          Clement                              5,118,507      June  2, 1992              
               Claims 15 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          unpatentable over Cobb or Bolich in view of Clement and Pader.                 

                                            2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007