THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CECIL R. GURGANUS,
RAY C. SANFORD
and
FRANCIS L. HORNING
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1100
Application 07/928,0711
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative
Patent Judges.
1Application for patent filed August 12, 1992. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Applica-
tion 07/559,125, filed July 26, 1990, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007