THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHARLES T. KRESGE, MICHAEL E. LEONOWICZ,
WIESLAW J. ROTH and JAMES C. VARTULI
__________
Appeal No. 95-1437
Application 07/734,9981
__________
HEARD: October 14, 1997
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed July 24, 1991. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/625,245 filed December 10, 1990, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,098,684 issued March 24, 1992, which is a continuation-in-
part of Application 07/470,008 filed January 25, 1990, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,102,643 issued April 17, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007