THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NANETTE BROWN
____________
Appeal No. 95-1955
Application 08/109,9821
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 10-12, all of which are
independent claims. No claim has been allowed.
Reference Relied on by the Examiner
Nibby, Jr. et al. Patent No. 4,527,251 Jul. 2, 1985
(Nibby)
Application for patent filed August 23, 1993. According
to the appellant, it is a continuation application of application
07/827,911, filed on January 31, 1992, now abandoned, which is a
continuation application of application 07/292,195, filed on
December 30, 1988, also now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007