THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HYMAN R. LUBOWITZ and CLYDE H. SHEPPARD
__________
Appeal No. 95-3097
Application 07/639,0511
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 18 through 20, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34 through
37, 40, 41, 43 through 46, 54 through 57, 63 through 66 and 69.
Claims 11, 16, 29, 31, 33, 42, 67, 68, 70 and 71 are also
pending, however, the examiner has now withdrawn the rejection
1Application for patent filed January 9, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007