THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JACQUELINE M. DEANE
_______________
Appeal No. 95-3282
Application 07/758,1491
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6, all of the
claims pending in the application. The examiner now holds claim 4 to be directed to
allowable subject matter, the claim being merely objected to. Accordingly, there is no
longer a rejection of claim 4 before us on appeal.
The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for image enhancement.
Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
1 Application for patent filed September 12, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007