THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS NEUHAUS
____________
Appeal No. 95-3411
Application 08/040,9601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 4-8 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, as being indefinite and also under 35 U.S.C.
103 under prior art.
References Relied on by the Examiner
Bado et al. U.S. Patent No. 4,703,423 October 27, 1987
(Bado)
Application for patent filed March 31, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007