THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RHONDA TRACY
____________
Appeal No. 95-3512
Application 08/092,5401
____________
HEARD: September 17, 1997
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 26 through
39 and 41, all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed July 16, 1993. According to
the appellant, the Application is a continuation of Application
07/790,469, filed November 12, 1991, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/516,473, filed April 30, 1990, now
U.S. Patent No. 5,064,421, which is a continuation of Application
07/093,681, filed September 8, 1987, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007