THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL R. SCHWAEGERLE
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3630
Application No. 08/001,9931
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CAROFF, JOHN D. SMITH, and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 24-26. Appellant’s brief states that “a supplemental
amendment canceling claim 26 accompanies this brief”.
1Application for patent filed January 8, 1993, which is
according to appellant, a continuation of application 07/858,385,
filed March 25, 1992, now U.S. Patent 5,194,209, issued March 16,
1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007