Paper No. 17
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte RICHARD BEALKOWSKI,
RALPH M. BEGUN
AND LOUIS B. CAPPS, JR.
______________
Appeal No. 95-3648
Application 07/777,8441
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 22 to 27, appellants having canceled
claims 1 to 21.
The pertinent portion of independent method claim 22 and
independent apparatus claim 25 on appeal is the determination of
which of a cold-start firmware memory and an alternate firmware
Application for patent filed October 16, 1991.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007