THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BERNARD BENE
____________
Appeal No. 95-3830
Application 07/942,4601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 12, 15-17, 20-22, 25 and 26
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over prior art.
Claims 1-11 have been canceled. Dependent claims 13, 14, 18, 19,
23 and 24 have been indicated as being allowable if presented in
proper form.
References Relied on by the Examiner
Application for patent filed September 9, 1992.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007