Ex parte FARRINGTON et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4135                                                          
          Application 07/772,998                                                      


                    This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1            
          through 9, 11 through 17 and 21.  In an Amendment After Final2              
          (paper number 19-1/2), claims 5, 9, 11 and 21 were amended.                 
                    The disclosed invention relates to a communication                
          interface for circuit breakers that are connected to a power bus            
          in a circuit breaker distribution panel.  Each circuit breaker is           
          designated by at least one coded signal that it receives via the            
          communication bus, and each of the circuit breakers interrupts              
          and establishes an associated current path.  A decoding means               
          associated with each of the circuit breakers determines                     
          correspondence between the coded signal and a circuit breaker.              
          If correspondence is found, then the decoding means associated              
          with the circuit breaker returns a response signal via a coupling           
          means to the communication bus.                                             
                    Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and             
          it reads as follows:                                                        
                    1. A communication interface system for circuit                   
          breakers which are connected to a power bus in a circuit breaker            
          distribution panel, the system comprising:                                  
                    a plurality of circuit breakers mounted within the                
          circuit breaker distribution panel, wherein each of said circuit            
          breakers is designated by at least one coded signal and each of             

           As indicated in the Advisory Action (paper number 21), the2                                                                      
          amendment to claims 5, 9, 11 and 21 had the effect of overcoming            
          the indefiniteness rejection of claims 5, 9, 11, 12 and 21.                 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007