THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte REINHOLD SUSSMANN
____________
Appeal No. 95-4148
Application 08/113,6611
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LYDDANE, ABRAMS, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 10 and 13 through 21, all of the claims pending
in the application. Upon reconsideration, the examiner has2
withdrawn all rejections of claims 8 through 10 and 14. Claims 8
through 10 now stand allowed and claim 14, which has been
indicated as being allowable if rewritten in independent form,
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993.
2Claim 9 has been amended subsequent to final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007