Ex parte BLYTHIN - Page 1





          Appeal No. 95-4487                                                          
          Application 07/852,214                                                      


                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today               
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                          Paper No. 18                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte DAVID J. BLYTHIN                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 95-4487                                   
                               Application 07/852,2141                                
                                     _______________                                  
                                        On BRIEF                                      
                                     _______________                                  
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.      
          WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 Decision on Appeal                                   
            This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the decision of              
          the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 9, all of the               
          claims in the application.                                                  



          1Application for patent filed May 29, 1992.                                 

                                         - 1                                          
                                          -                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007