Appeal No. 95-4722
Application 07/946,226
The examiner relies on the following references:
Wah Lo 4,800,407 Jan. 24, 1989
Hiraoka 4,870,600 Sep. 26, 1989
Travis 5,132,839 July 21, 1992
Claims 1-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As
evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Wah Lo in view of
Travis with respect to claims 1-17 and 21-24, and Hiraoka in
view of Travis with respect to claims 18-20.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken
into consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants'
arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner's
rationale in support of the rejections and arguments in
rebuttal set forth in the examiner's answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007