THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KARL C. KHARAS, MICHAEL G. HENK and HEINZ J. ROBOTA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4932
Application No. 07/990,2161
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of
claims 1 and 3-12, all the claims remaining in the involved
application.
The claims relate to a multi-component catalyst for
removing carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and especially
nitrogen oxides (NO ) from the exhaust gases of a lean-burn
x
1Application for patent filed December 14, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007