THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD WON,
MARTIN A. KATZ,
CHUNG H. CHENG,
and SERGIO NACHT
__________
Appeal No. 95-5076
Application 08/079,2201
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GRON, Administrative Patent Judges.
1Application for patent filed June 17, 1993. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of application serial no. 07/802,664, filed December 5, 1991;
which was a continuation-in-part of application serial no. 07/644,869, filed January 23,
1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,145,675; which was a continuation of application serial no.
07/334,051, filed April 5, 1989; which was a division of application serial no. 07/091,641,
filed August 31, 1987; which was a continuation-in-part of application serial no.
06/810,478, filed December 18, 1985; serial no. 06/846,321, filed March 31, 1986; serial
no. 06/896,956, filed August 15, 1986; serial no. 06/925,081, filed October 30, 1986;
serial no. 06/925,082, filed October 30, 1986; serial no. 06/932,613, filed November 11,
1986; serial no. 06/933,243, filed November 21, 1986; serial no. 06/936,520, filed
December 1, 1986; and serial no. 06/940,754, filed December 10, 1986.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007