THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SAMEER H. ELDIN,
JURG MAURER, ROBERT P. PEYER,
PETER GRIESHABER and FRANCOIS RIME
Appeal No. 95-5080
Application 07/952,1221
_________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before DOWNEY, SMITH JOHN D. and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-4, 6-13 and 15-21, all the claims pending
in the application.
Application for patent filed on September 28, 1992.1
According to the appellants, this application is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/674,637, filed March 25, 1991,
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007